 An online database of WORLD WAR
II books and information on the Web since 1995
Home New & forthcoming
Books by subjects
Book reviews
Recommended reading
Book forum
Latest book feedback
Popular resources
Recent views
Random book
Newsletter requests
Sell your books
War Diary
Armies
Nations at war
History
Trivia challenge
WWII links
About us
Site guide
Site index
|
|
Campbell, John. Naval Weapons of World War Two. Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press, 2002
ISBN 0-87021-459-4
403 pages
Acknowledgements and Sources; Publisher's Note; Glossary and Abbreviations; photos; charts; tables; diagrams; Index
Along with a small number of other technical and specialist volumes such as the Conway series and Eberhard Rossler's The U-Boat, John Campbell's Naval Weapons of World War Two has long been recognized as one of the most important sources for detailed, accurate information about naval weapons systems.
Originally published in 1985 (by Conway Maritime Press in the UK and NIP in the US), Naval Weapons has been out of print for years and the price of secondhand copies has climbed to the $300-400 range. Fortunately for everyone interested in this masterpiece, Conway and NIP finally reprinted it at the end of 2002. John Campbell died in 1998, so this is just a reprint, not a revised edition, but the breadth and depth of material remains unmatched.
The book is organized primarily according to nationality:
Great Britain
United States of America
Japan
Germany
France
Italy
Soviet Union
Other Countries (including Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Denmark, Finland, Greece, Netherlands, Norway, Peru, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Spain, Sweden, Thailand, Turkey, and Yugoslavia)
Within each nation, the material is divided into several categories:
Naval guns
Torpedoes
Anti-submarine weapons
Mines
Bombs, rockets, and missiles
Each of those categories is further sub-divided. For the British, for example, naval guns are organized this way:
Identification
Gun design
Gun mountings
Propellants
Projectiles
Development of fire-control
Low-angle control
High-angle control
Close-range HA control
Heavy calibre guns (16in - 13.5in)
Medium calibre breech-loading guns (9.2in - 4.7in)
Light calibre breech-loading guns (4in)
Medium calibre quick-firing guns (6in - 4.5in)
Light calibre quick-firing guns (4in - 3pdr)
Automatic guns (40mm - 0.30in)
For each one of these sub-categories for each nation, Campbell thoroughly discusses everything there is to say about each system. Depending on the weapon, this information can range from a short paragraph to several pages. In most instances, the text for each weapon is accompanied by photos, a table giving technical specifications (such as bore, weight, length, length of chamber, volume of chamber, length of rifling, grooves, lands, twist, weight of projectile, propellant charge, muzzle velocity, working pressure, approximate life, maximum range), diagrams, etc.
Here's an example of Campbell's text, in this case the German T5 Zaunkonig 1 homing torpedo, which should give a good idea of the amount of data provided:
This passive homer, known to the British as
GNAT, was intended to attack convoy escorts
proceeding at 10-18kts. The torpedo speed was
limited to 24-25kts for reasons of self noise so
that it was unlikely to catch a ship doing over
18kts as the homing run was sinuous, and at
below 10kts the target's noise would not be
sufficient to activate the homing system. There
were two varieties of T5, one with a flat and the
other with a rounded nose. The first had four
magnetostrictive hydrophones wired in pairs
with a phase delay between pairs so that the
maximum electrical output was for sound
arriving at ± 25° to the torpedo axis. In the
second a bakelite cap protected two
hydrophones, each behind a funnel baffled to
give maximum sensitivity at ± 25°. To give good
acoustic transmission, cap and funnels were
filled with glycerin and ethylene glycol. Both
used an amplitude comparison system known as
Amsel and the rudders steered to the noisier
side.
The system was virtually deaf abaft c70°, and
if the sound was straight ahead both receivers
gave equal voltages, so that the torpedo would
run straight until it was passing the target when
a very sharp turn was called for. The torpedo
could not comply and missed astern, running
out of contact. Two programmes were devised
to avoid this and could be selected by a switch. If
the relative bearings of the U-boat from target
were 0-110° the 'Ahead' programme was used,
and if 110-180° the 'Astern'. In 'Ahead', the
first signal caused the torpedo to circle until it
picked up a counter command. This brought it
abaft the beam of the target from where it was
expected to home normally. The rudder was
locked amidships for two seconds each time the
signal was lost, but the gyro course which would
take the torpedo away from the target was never
switched in.
In 'Astern' after homing began, the rudder
remained hard over as long as a signal was
received. When the signal failed the rudder was
locked amidships for about 2sec and then the
original gyro course was held until a signal was
again received.
For the First 400m (400yd) the homing was
inoperative and the torpedo followed the gyro
course to give the U-boat a chance to keep clear,
and as previously noted the pistol only
responded to targets above. The homing
distance varied very much, but 450m (500yd)
was reasonable for a 15kt ship. To reduce
bottom reflections the minimum depth was
originally 90m (50 fathoms), but this was later
reduced to 18m (10 fathoms) when T5 was issued
to E-boats. Total weight of the torpedo was
1497kg (3300lb) and range 5700m
(6230yd)/24-25kts. Maintenance was a serious
problem as torpedoes were damp and difficult
of internal access, and a T5 had 11 electronic
valves, 26 relays, 1760 soldered or screw
connections, and 30,000m (33,000yd) of wire.
Much effort went into the development of the
T5 including over 2500 test runs.
U-boats initially carried two each, later four,
and 640 were fired for 58 hits, whereas all other
German torpedoes aggregated over 20% hits,
though it must be noted that T5 was often fired
at difficult targets, and that there were special
allied countermeasures. When T5 was first used
in September 1943, these were not in operation
and three escorts were sunk and another
damaged. It had been believed for a
considerable time that acoustic torpedoes were
on the way, and the design of a noise maker
known as 'Foxer' was begun in late 1942. It
began to be used after the above T5 attacks, but
it was many months before all escorts had it.
Foxer was a towed arrangement of metal rods
which clanged together and, by German
estimates, produced 10-100 times the noise of a
ship. It was known to U-boat crews as the
'circular saw'. It spoilt the performance of the
towing ship's sound gear, and the first models
could not be towed at over 15kts, though this
was increased to 20kts in later patterns.
In addition speeds of over 18kts and of 8kts or
less provided a good measure of protection, as
the Germans had expected, but they had not
foreseen an effective tactical counter known as
'Step aside'. On locating the surfaced U-boat,
by radar or other means, the escort would turn
back to place the U-boat 60¡ on the opposite
bow, and continue this course for mile at
15kts, then turning to parallel the original
bearing of the U-boat and covering a further
mile before turning towards the U-boat and
attacking.
The dust jacket calls Naval Weapons of World War Two John Campbells's magnum opus, and that's absolutely right. This is a massive reference work that undeniably belongs on the shelf of every serious student of the naval aspects of the Second World War. Thanks to the recent reprints from Naval Institute Press and Conway, it's no longer necessary to shell out $300 for a copy, so there's no excuse for failing to grab one before these go out of print again and the price climbs back out of reach.
Highly, highly recommended.
Available from online booksellers, local bookshops, or directly from Naval Institute Press in the US.
Thanks to NIP for providing this review copy.
Read and submit feedback
Reviewed 2 February 2003
Copyright © 2003 by Bill Stone
May not be reproduced in any form without written permission of Stone & Stone
|